Analítica en España. Sin banner de cookies.
The AEPD 2024 cookies guide carves out anonymous audience measurement from the consent obligation. This is what the carve-out requires, how it aligns with the CNIL and DSK positions, and what changed with the Digital Omnibus.
The 4 conditions of the AEPD exemption
The AEPD guide is less prescriptive than the CNIL’s 14-point self-assessment, but the substantive conditions converge. Four architectural requirements:
Anonymous aggregate measurement
AEPD 2024 cookies guide: tools used only for anonymous audience measurement, with no cross-site tracking, do not require consent.
Aggregate channel and conversion counts only. No identifier per visitor, no profile, no cross-site behaviour tracked. The criterion is met by architectural design.
No personal data processed
AEPD aligns with the EDPB Opinion 5/2019: if the processing does not relate to an identified or identifiable person, GDPR material scope does not apply.
No IP address collected. No User-Agent fingerprint stored. No identifier generated. The events are channel-level aggregates from the moment they hit the server.
First-party context only
LSSI-CE Art. 22.2 governs cookie use. Anonymous measurement that stays first-party and does not enable cross-site tracking falls outside the consent requirement.
Pixel runs on a CNAME under the customer's own domain. First-party server-side. No third-party identifier, no cross-site data path.
EU residency
Spanish authorities emphasise EU-only processing to keep Schrems II transfer concerns out of the analysis.
Processing exclusively in Dublin, Ireland — within the GDPR adequacy zone. No third-country transfer occurs.
Public-sector and regulated industries
Spanish public-sector procurement (administraciones públicas, universities, hospitals, regional governments) applies stricter rules than commercial eCommerce — and the architectural exemption fits the procurement requirements cleanly:
- Schrems II clean — processing in Dublin, no US sub-processors.
- Signed DPA under GDPR Art. 28, available pre-filled for counter-signature.
- TPSR package covering data flows, retention, encryption and access control.
- ENS / ISO posture documented (we are not currently ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certified — the roadmap and controls operated today are documented in full).
- Lawful basis under Art. 6(1)(f) plus LSSI-CE 22.2 exemption — no consent banner required for the analytics layer.
Common DPO questions
- Does the AEPD exemption mean no cookie banner at all?
- It means no cookie banner is required for the analytics layer specifically, provided the analytics meets the conditions: aggregate, anonymous, no cross-site tracking, no personal data. Other tools on your site (Google Ads pixels, Meta pixels, A/B testing platforms that set cookies) still require consent. Many Spanish eCommerce teams reduce the banner scope to those specific tools instead of running a catch-all banner.
- What does the LSSI-CE say about cookies?
- Article 22.2 of the Ley de Servicios de la Sociedad de la Información y de Comercio Electrónico (LSSI-CE, 2002 with later amendments) is the Spanish implementation of ePrivacy Art. 5(3). It requires informed consent before storing or accessing information on the user's terminal device. The AEPD has issued guidance (most recently the 2024 cookies guide) describing when the exemption applies — and aggregate audience measurement is explicitly included.
- Did the AEPD change position with the Digital Omnibus?
- Not on the exemption itself. The Omnibus tightened banner-design enforcement and harmonised national approaches, but the AEPD's position on anonymous audience measurement survived intact. If anything, the new floor on banner design makes the cookie-based path more expensive while leaving the exempt architectures unchanged.
- Is SealMetrics suitable for Spanish public-sector sites?
- Yes. Public-sector procurement in Spain typically requires Schrems II clean processing (no US transfer), a signed DPA under GDPR Art. 28, and either explicit consent or an exemption. SealMetrics ships all three: EU-only processing in Dublin, a pre-filled DPA, and the architectural exemption under LSSI-CE 22.2. Several Spanish public-sector operators run SealMetrics for that reason.
- What does the privacy policy still need to say?
- The privacy policy must mention the analytics tool, its purpose, the data categories processed (channel-level aggregates), the retention period, and the lawful basis (Art. 6(1)(f) legitimate interest, paired with the LSSI-CE 22.2 exemption). The transparency obligation under GDPR Art. 13/14 applies regardless of whether consent is collected. A template is included in our TPSR package.
- Does the AEPD position align with the CNIL?
- Yes, on the exemption itself. Both authorities accept anonymous aggregate audience measurement without consent provided the architecture meets specific conditions. The AEPD guide is less prescriptive than the CNIL's 14-point self-assessment but converges on the same outcome: no identifier on the device, no cross-site tracking, no personal data, EU residency.
One AEPD review. Resuelta.
Book with the founder. Bring your DPO. We walk through the AEPD conditions live and ship the DPA + TPSR on the call.
Built by a founder · supported by a founder · EU-hosted by design
